<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ICMPECHO &#187; telecom immunity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.icmpecho.com/tag/telecom-immunity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.icmpecho.com</link>
	<description>more than your usual type 8&#039;s</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EFF sues to overturn US Telecom immunity</title>
		<link>http://www.icmpecho.com/2008/10/19/eff-sues-to-overturn-us-telecom-immunity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icmpecho.com/2008/10/19/eff-sues-to-overturn-us-telecom-immunity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Nyström</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmpecho.com/?p=958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From EFF (via BoingBoing) &#8211; &#8216;EFF Challenges Constitutionality of Telecom Immunity in Federal Court&#8217;: &#8220;The immunity law puts the fox in charge of the hen house, letting the Attorney General decide whether or not telecoms like AT&#038;T can be sued for participating in the government&#8217;s illegal warrantless surveillance,&#8221; said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.icmpecho.com/images/EFF-logo-trans.png" alt="Electronic Frontier Foundation - www.eff.org" /><br />
From <a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2008/10/17">EFF</a> (via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/10/17/eff-sues-to-overturn.html">BoingBoing</a>) &#8211; <em>&#8216;EFF Challenges Constitutionality of Telecom Immunity in Federal Court&#8217;</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
<em><font color="black">&#8220;The immunity law puts the fox in charge of the hen house, letting the Attorney General decide whether or not telecoms like AT&#038;T can be sued for participating in the government&#8217;s illegal warrantless surveillance,&#8221; said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston. &#8220;In our constitutional system, it is the judiciary&#8217;s role as a co-equal branch of government to determine the scope of the surveillance and rule on whether it is legal, not the executive&#8217;s. The Attorney General should not be allowed to unconstitutionally play judge and jury in these cases, which affect the privacy of millions of Americans.&#8221;</font></em></p></blockquote>
<p>Read the <a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2008/10/17">whole article here!</a></p>
<p>EFF rules (!) and is one of the sharpest swords against the non-democratic laws being set all over the world. I do not live in the US, but I surely hope that they&#8217;ll win this one. If so, maybe they will regain some of their lost freedom.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://secure.eff.org/donate">Support EFF by donating!</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icmpecho.com/2008/10/19/eff-sues-to-overturn-us-telecom-immunity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

