police

You are currently browsing articles tagged police.

Carlo Nicora in Flickr - http://flickr.com/photos/fchouse/2806122223
Photo: Carlo Nicora on FlickrCC BY-NC-SA.

Laugh? Cry? or what…

I think the Swedish democracy is messed up, but in the UK they’re a couple of steps ahead of us…

From British Journal of Photography (via BoingBoing) on a new “Anti-Terror” law in the UK:

“The new set of rules, under section 76 of the 2008 Act and section 58A of the 2000 Act, will target anyone who ‘elicits or attempts to elicit information about (members of armed forces) … which is of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism’.

A person found guilty of this offence could be liable to imprisonment for up to 10 years, and to a fine.

The law is expected to increase the anti-terrorism powers used today by police officers to stop photographers, including press photographers, from taking pictures in public places.”

10 YEARS IN PRISON??? Come on for gods sake. This is just sick.

Read the full article here.

Tags: , , , ,

Hughelectronic on Flickr - http://flickr.com/photos/hughelectronic/
Photo: hughelectronic on Flickr. CC BY-NC-SA

The use of warrantless hacking is soon a reality in Great Britain. Yes, that is Police breaking into citizens computers in order to see if they’ve done something wrong or not without evidence or a court order.

From The Times (via HAX (Swedish)):

THE Home Office has quietly adopted a new plan to allow police across Britain routinely to hack into people’s personal computers without a warrant.

The move, which follows a decision by the European Union’s council of ministers in Brussels, has angered civil liberties groups and opposition MPs. They described it as a sinister extension of the surveillance state which drives “a coach and horses” through privacy laws.

The hacking is known as “remote searching”. It allows police or MI5 officers who may be hundreds of miles away to examine covertly the hard drive of someone’s PC at his home, office or hotel room.

Material gathered in this way includes the content of all e-mails, web-browsing habits and instant messaging.

Read the full article over at The Times.

This isn’t really news and the Swedish Government has similar propositions being prepared. Another step to the total control society indeed.

To protect yourself you can do several things out of which installing and using Linux (and keeping it up to date) might be the first. If you’re stuck in a Windows environment you should keep up with your patches and install an Anti-Malware (anti-virus) application that does not solely rely on signatures as some vendors agree to exclude certain states spy-tools from scanning by those. Choose one that has behavioral blocking of some sort or other mechanisms for detecting hostile code without having an exact signature. Also choose a solution which has some kind of personal firewall shipped with it so you can see the applications that tries to connect to the outside world and pay attention to its warnings.

If you are in need of a wireless network, buy an AP (Access Point) that you then connect to your router (another separate unit) in a port which is isolated from the rest of your internal network. There are guides on how to do this in your manual (if not, buy a new router) and you can also leave a comment if you need further help. I’m can also do ultra-cheap consulting for those that need help evaluating their current security during evenings and weekends.

And yes, these are the same basic instruction that I give to home users when educating them on how they can protect themselves from getting their credit cards and/or identity stolen…

What’s wrong with the people suggesting and implementing these laws?

God damned idiots…

Tags: , , , , ,

regolare on Flickr - http://flickr.com/photos/regolare/
Photo: regolare on Flickr.

Two not-so-nice highlights of my RSS feeds:

First, from Edent (via BoingBoing) that got stuck in a “stop and search” checkpoint (video in both links):

A Londoner was stopped by a London Transport Police officer under S.44 of the Terrorism Act 2000, and had the presence of mind to whip out his video camera and record the officers tearing through his stuff. They officers admitted that they had no suspicion of him, no reason to search him and told him he’d be arrested if he refused. [...]

So that is what you do in a democratic country. Nice.

And second, from Emily Feder at Alternet that got detained by US DHS returning from Libya:

[...] No one who had been detained knew precisely why they were there. A few people were led into private rooms; others were questioned out in the open at desks a few feet from the crowd and then allowed to pass through customs. Some were sent to another section of the holding area with large computer screens and cameras, and then brought back. The uninformed consensus among the detainees was that some people would be fingerprinted, have their irises scanned and be sent back to the countries from which they had disembarked, regardless of citizenship status; others would be fingerprinted and allowed to stay; and the unlucky ones would be detained indefinitely and moved to a more permanent facility. [...]

Lovely. Just lovely. It’s a good thing they’re safe from terrorists now though…

*shrug*

Tags: , , , ,