<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ICMPECHO &#187; firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.icmpecho.com/tag/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.icmpecho.com</link>
	<description>More than your usual type 8's</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Firefox JAR: vulnerability - quick summary</title>
		<link>http://www.icmpecho.com/2007/11/14/firefox-jar-vulnerability-quick-summary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icmpecho.com/2007/11/14/firefox-jar-vulnerability-quick-summary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Nyström</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[exploit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[webapps]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jar]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[recap]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[xss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmpecho.com/2007/11/14/firefox-jar-vulnerability-quick-summary/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you that has not been following the computer security news and blogs there is a new vulnerability in town, and it&#8217;s nasty.
The problem lies in the jar: protocol implementation used by Firefox and it enables an attacker to conduct XSS and gives them almost limitless possibilitys for malware hosting.
This is an example [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>For those of you that has not been following the computer security news and blogs there is a new vulnerability in town, and it&#8217;s nasty.</strong></p>
<p>The problem lies in the<strong> <em>jar:</em> protocol implementation used by Firefox</strong> and it enables an attacker to conduct XSS and gives them almost limitless possibilitys for malware hosting.</p>
<p>This is an example URI which exploits the issue:</p>
<p align="center"><font color="#ffcc99"><strong>jar:http://www.icmpecho.com/myjarshrine/yarihooo.jpg!/malwareloadingscript.html</strong></font></p>
<p><strong>Now, instead of copying others work which they have probably spent hours or more on</strong> to explain the issue in full, I&#8217;ll give you a short recap of the happenings and more and more exposing blog posts:</p>
<hr /> <strong>2007-02-08 - <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369814" target="_blank">Jesse Ruderman logs the bug in the Mozilla bugzilla tracker</a>.</strong> It remains unpatched and not widely known until&#8230;<strong>2007-11-07 - <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/web-mayhem-firefoxs-jar-protocol-issues">Researcher pdp discusses the issue and potential impact at GNUCitizen</a>.</strong> This opens this bug up to a whole new audience and&#8230;<strong>2007-11-10 - <a href="http://blog.beford.org/?p=8" target="_blank">Beford illustrates the seriousness of this issue and issues in the same family</a></strong> by targeting Google and Gmail and posts a  <strong><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403331" target="_blank">new bug entry</a></strong>.<strong>2007-11-10 - <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/tomorrows-trojan-peddlers">And then Mario posts at GNUCitizen about other attack vectors</a></strong> including malware- and exploit-hosting.<br />
<hr />During these last days we have also seen some very strange recommendations from leading scurity experts at <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=652" target="_blank">ZDNet</a>, <a href="http://secunia.com/advisories/27605/" target="_blank">Secunia</a> and <a href="http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/715737" target="_blank">US Cert</a> (and one at <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/12/jar_vuln/" target="_blank">The register</a> as well) as the most excellent <a href="http://hackademix.net/2007/11/13/a-jar-of-misleading-advices/trackback/" target="_blank">Giorgio over at the Hackademix blog</a>.</p>
<p>The problems with the recommendations given by these persons and/or organisations is mainly that the <strong>recommend blocking URI&#8217;s containing JAR: in webfilters and deep packet inspecting firewalls or avoid following &#8220;jar:&#8221; links</strong>.You should understand why this would be a total waste of time if you have read the above articles and in particular Giorgio&#8217;s comments on the issue.</p>
<p>Also you should know why if you have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iframe">seen one page load another</a> like in most web based exploits (<a href="http://www.sr.se/cgi-bin/ekot/artikel.asp?Artikel=1717140" target="_blank">Including the one on the Swedish Parliament&#8217;s websites this week</a> (swedish link, sorry)). My feeling is that the first advisories were rushed out &#8220;to be first in the corporate sector&#8221; and sloppy research took its toll.</p>
<p><strong>If you do want to protect yourselves for real</strong>, you might wanna download and install <a href="http://noscript.net/faq#jar" target="_blank">the <strong>NoScript extension</strong> to Firefox which also handles JAR</a>.</p>
<p>Happy times! <img src='http://www.icmpecho.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icmpecho.com/2007/11/14/firefox-jar-vulnerability-quick-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
